teaching

I have taught over twenty courses as an instructor of record between my time at Purdue University, York University, the University of Pennsylvania, Brooklyn College and the College of Charleston since 2013. You can find many of my detailed course evaluations here and my comprehensive evaluations from my time at York here.

– A graduate seminar on Reason and Cognition (PHIL 680) – Fall 2023
– Several sections of our Transformative Texts and Critical Thinking course (SCLA102) – Spring 2023
– Several sections of our prize winning Introduction to Philosophy Through Videogames Course (PHIL11005) – Fall 2022, 2023
– A special topics seminar in Philosophy of Cognitive Science (PHIL 4082) – Winter 2022
– One section of Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence (PHIL 3750) – Winter 2022
– One section of Philosophy of Neuroscience (PHIL 3565) – Fall 2021
– Two sections of Philosophy of Psychology (PHIL 3260) – Fall 2021 & Winter 2022
– One section of Philosophy of Mind (PHIL 244) – Spring 2019
– Five sections of Business and Consumer Ethics
– Five sections of Introduction to the Problems of Philosophy

Additionally, I’ve taught two sessions of Statistical methods and analysis for experimental philosophy at the Berlin School of Mind and Brain in 2017.

At Purdue University I have helped develop and teach our new course: Introduction to Philosophy through Videogames. As part of this course, students complete modules that focus on a videogame that explores a relevant philosophical theme (e.g. Papers Please during our ethics module). Students are expected to play at least 100 minutes of each game per week and use their gameplay, along with readings and course discussions to work on their reflection assignments. 

I am an advocate of team-based learning (TBL) approaches, which I’ve successfully integrated in my recent courses. I’m also developing new syllabi that incorporate elements of TBL in upper-division philosophy courses. If you’d like to look over my syllabi just send me an email.

Often, I split my classes between a TBL-phase and an application-phase. During TBL, students will break into their predetermined, four-to-five person, semester-long teams–equipped with their own team-names and representatives (think pub quiz team). Teams then have three tasks: a team-quiz, an individual-quiz, and a team-review. During the team-quiz, teams must develop a consensus to answer a series of long-form questions that tie the readings together. Then, everyone must answer an individual quiz–with short-form questions, that covers the readings. This encourages students to ask questions of their peers if they’re unsure of the material. Finally, everyone must complete a team-review where they evaluate their teammates, and provide constructive criticism. It’s important that the professor finds a way to detect and dissuade collusion. I’m pretty strict, and will fail a team for the entire exercise if their comments are not thoughtful and transparent.

After the TBL-phase, we reconvene to field questions, discuss the readings, and apply the arguments to a series of contemporary issues, often bringing in various media sources (think youtube and the New Yorker).

In my experience, TBL-styled exercises do increase student engagement, and they strongly incentivize preparation and familiarization with the material. In a pure TBL course, which I’m interested to try in future introductory preparations, nearly the entire class-time is devoted to TBL exercises. Also, both team and individual quizzes are presented as multiple-choice scratch-off cards, which allows for immediate feedback and a more tense team-deliberation phase.

For more information on TBL approaches, and how to implement TBL in philosophy courses specifically, I’d recommend the following:

updated 05.2024